Here We Go Again

Another psycho incident on the Denver bus system. An apparently anti-social woman equates being asked to share a bench seat with "being violated."

Obama Constituent Threatens McCain

We already know that jail bait, drug users, winos, and other assorted social outcasts, misfits, racial greivance lobbies and Marxists are the traditional voting base of the Democratic Party. This threat letter only goes to prove the point. I suspected it was an angry black person, even before I heard the letter came from a prison inmate. A little logic goes a long way.

Source article

Shocker: Mayoral Pot Committee Says Ignore Pot Laws

If Denver residents aren't crackheads they're potheads. With the passage of a legally irrelevant ordinance (written by a disingenous group of potheads called SAFER) which calls for relaxation of enforcement of marijuana possession laws by setting pot prosecutions a low priority (and so making it all but legal), the Denver Marijuana Policy Review Panel which was formed as part of this ordinance has released a memorandum telling the Denver Police to lay off potheads during the Democratic National Convention. Yes, these potheads are so committed to their Cheech & Chong lifestyle that they've suckered the public into passing an ordinance in which we are all forced to pay for a Pothead Panel. SAFER has pushed its agenda by saying that the police would be freed from pursuing potheads (without offering proof that the police are burdened by pot laws) so they can handle other matters. Police don't "pursue" potheads anyway. If they're caught with the stuff after being stopped for something else, or if they're seen smoking a fat blunt in public (maybe) they'll get cited. Now of course if you consider the public cost of this Pothead Panel, we could just as easily use that money to hire more police officers to enforce all existing laws (thereby unburdening them!) rather than dishonestly trying to sneak certain offenses past on a childishly transparent pretext of public safety which crumbles under logical analysis. You have to wonder how many drug dealers belong to this group.

Part of the resolution reads,

The Marijuana Policy Review Panel recommends that the Denver Police Department should refrain from arresting, detaining, or issuing a citation to any adult 21 years of age or older for the private possession of up to one ounce of marijuana during the 2008 Democratic National Convention.

So far the Denver Police and Denver DA aren't interested in ignoring the law in favor of potheads nor ignoring the connection between marijuana smuggling and widespread gang violence. Bummer, dude.

Source article

Update: "Open House" at Invesco Field

After getting the runaround via email I finally confirmed it. Yep.. It's a hoax. I just got off the telephone with the Obama HQ office that is doing the ticket distribution. During the 2 days of call-backs of selectionees I was not contacted at all. I was just told that only people who were selected were contacted. He had no explanation of why I was rejected after my early request the first few hours of the application process. My early application has meant nothing, and I don't believe for a minute that the entirety of the throngs of drooling Obamabots who applied after me were likewise rejected for tickets. The only explanation, then, is that there was in fact some sort of vetting process for applicants. Non-Democrats, non contributors and other unknowns were sifted out. There is no other logical explanation. Obama doesn't want thousands of hecklers in that stadium while he's waxing righteous on worldwide television. It was a public relations ploy, and nothing more.

Hoax: DNC "Open House" at Invesco Field

The Democratic National Committee is offering 30,000 free seats to Colorado residents at Invesco Field for Barack Obama's acceptance speech which they are touting as a "historical event" which wouldn't be one except the Democrats are indirectly pushing the race issue in calling it such. So much for post-racial.

The DNCC advertised these seats as being open to the whole of the community, regardless of political affiliation, first come, first serve. They gave no indication of disqualifying factors other than ability to travel to the event and have a verifiable identity. Logically speaking, this makes little sense. I was proven correct as I applied for two "community credentials" only hours after the DNC began accepting applications. My submission was well within the window of available seating, therefore numerically, I should have been guaranteed credentials. My application, however, has gone down the memory hole. I had my suspicions verified today by the Denver comPost's PoliticsWest.com audio news report called Obamarama Ticket Update. The announcer declared that he had recieved an email from the DNCC inquiring if he was still interested in the credentials, and whom to contact about it. I received no such email. All that did happen on my end was that after I submitted my application for credentials, I was kindly added to the Obama campaign's spam email list.

As Obama's public appearances - especially those on television - are known to be controlled, scripted and coreographed as much as possible, its highly unlikely that his crowning moment at the Democratic Convention would be any less. Just letting anyone in could end up disruption, his speech among his flock being submerged in waves of booing and jeering on worldwide television. More likely, then, that the general public offering was a public relations ploy of sorts to boast the number of people applying for access credentials by making it appear as if all those people really just love Obama and he loves them back. In reality, they've undoubtedly subject all applications to a secretive selection process likely beginning with the email address of submitters checked with the Obama campaign for contributions, campaign activity, and membership in the Colorado Democratic Party. Undoubtedly applicants who ticked the "volunteer" box with their submissions also were bounced to the front of the pecking order. As I am not a volunteer, nor donor, nor Democrat, I have been tossed by the wayside.

I have joined the ranks of those who have been Thrown Under the Bus™.

Morning on a Denver Doorstep

You have to love the internet and the video camera. Put the two together, and you get a fine picture of Denver living.

The Memory Hole of Political Correctness: Black on White Crime

Recently Denver was once again presented with a not-so-uncommon trend in crime: black on white. Numerous white women have been kidnapped at gunpoint and forced to withdraw money from ATM machines. All of the suspects are black males. Of course, the usual reaction to such things is stony silence followed by a quick trip down the memory hole. Obviously, the victims are being selected in part due to their gender and their race. The media were more than happy to say that "four women" were abducted, robbed, and sometimes hogtied. But that the victims were white and the suspects black? Nope, can't cross that line.



Source article


In 2006, a black male shot and murdered a white police officer and shot at a white woman who was driving to work. The white police officer was in his own vehicle, in civilian clothing. The killer approached him at a stoplight and shot him several times through his car window. Only one story I saw in the local Denver media at the time mentioned the racist views of the black killer as well as the racist literature found in his home. The others ignored it entirely. Would the media have taken this approach if the killer were white and the victims black? Of course not, so what's wrong with this picture?



Source


From 2007: A black male committed a home invasion robbery of a white man, stole his truck, robbed a bank and was finally apprehended when a quick-thinking cop ran him over with his car. With such common occurrences of black-on-white crime, even when a racial motive has been found, why does it always vanish down the memory hole of political correctness?



Source article

Not only are the media in general in denial about a black crime problem, but moreso in denial about the black-on-white crime epidemic. This epidemic is plainly obvious in annual US Department of Justice crime data and elsewhere, such as in studies of prison rape, which are overwhelmingly black-on-white. A few examples for browsing.

From FBI Uniform Crime Data (Source here)



Another example. 2005 Uniform Crime Data reported that 33% of white rape vicitms reported a black offender, while 0.0% of black rape victims reported a white offender. Refer to this page and click Table 42 for the year 2005.

Last, but not least, studies of prison rape conducted through several decades show a consistent racial pattern in rape. Stop Prisoner Rape's online study remarked,

"The fact remains that blacks continually and almost exclusively rape whites in prison. The evidence is based on studies conducted over the last 40 years (Davis 1968; Nacci 1978; Lookwood 1980; Starchild 1990). Why does this white victim preference prevail? Whites continue to be raped more severely and frequently and at a disproportionate rate than any other racial or ethnic group Gones 1976; Bowker 1980; Lookwood 1980). This racial inequality may be the largest in any violent crime committed in the United States...

This persistent victimisation of whites over any other ethnic or racial group is why conditions need to be implemented to protect whites from rape or future rapes in prison."

Source study (PDF file)

Interestingly, this major finding in prisoner rape is not easily found at http://www.srp.org. After all, who would send money to a group that discovered that most victims of a crime were white?! White victims just don't bring the sympathy and the dollars that black and brown victims do, and what enlightened person would hold black and brown attackers accountable (aren't these "hate crimes"?) and force them to leave those white boys alone? Nobody seems to have considered that this phenomena is likely fueling neo-Nazi gangs in prisons. After all, where else would a blue-eyed devil find protection?

You Can't Have a Sinister Base Without a Gargoyle in a Suitcase

How can I forget the tin foil helmet crowd? The Denver International Airport as underground base for the global elites which will serve to protect them in a global catastrophe theory is alive and well! YES, the lame multiCult artwork, the swastika runway design, scattered gargoyles and other symbolic nonsense at DIA are all signs of the Illuminati's grand plan for the masses. Oh, my!



And the fun doesn't stop there! Read on:

DIA as underground concentration camp
Stupid artwork, gargoyles, and Navajo inscriptions

The Chronic Denver Homeless and Those Who Love Them

It's amazing to see how the do-gooders who dedicate themselves to helping the homeless get a clue as to how many of the chronically homeless don't mind being so because it's become part of their lifestyle. In 1997 and 1998 I worked at a job where day labor was often used in busy times, and it happened more than once that after I got home from work I would head to a neighborhood food store only to see one or more of the day laborers that I had just gotten done working with coming out of Denver Drug & Liquor with an already open bottle of booze. In the 10 years since, I continue to see a few of them from time to time, always drunk and loitering somewhere. One I came across passed out drunk on a sidewalk. One thing that most advocates of the homeless do not understand is that 1) if these people are willing to work, the money they get all goes toward their alcohol and drugs, and 2) people like this tax food banks and soup lines because they want to spend their little money on alcohol and drugs which means that local food banks are unnecessarily burdened and drained. "Aiding" people like this only encourages them and prolongs their unwillingness to straighten up. Whenever you see someone panhandling or "performing" on the street for money, that person is either a chronically homeless drug and alcohol abuser or is a complete moron. I call them morons because local charities have free clothes, free clothes washing and even free showers to help them work. Combine this with the large number of jobs available to them and the picture of willful homelessness comes together. All I can figure of these advocates of the homeless is that they were reared in sheltered suburban environments and do not understand inner city lifestyles. In fact, most of these advocates tend to be middle class white people who often praise the Lord and I suspect many of the older ones help out to get into heaven.



Here's an example of someone who either doesn't want to hold down a job or is not able to formulate simple logic and mathematics. "Street performers" get very little money for all their guitar playing and bongo drum beating, and if they worked even a minimum wage job (which do not exist) they would come out vastly ahead for the same time spent. The idiocy is mind-boggling.

Someone Get These Bruthas a Can of Act-Right

Sharing among brothers is a great thing. The close-knit Armstrong family even share run-ins with the Denver Police. Pops Armstrong was shot to death by the po-po in 1980, and Earl, the elder brother, the community activist, police critic and wife beater, is convinced that his younger brother, Thomas Charles, wound up seriously injured and in a coma due to a vendetta harbored by the Denver Police due to his having filed a complaint against an officer 2 years before the incident which left T.C. hospitalized. Yes that's right. For 2 years, the Denver Police were itching for a chance of get-back and finally hit pay dirt the day they found Earl's younger brother drugged up and going bonkers in the middle of the street. "Oh look! It's that Armstrong guy! Kick his ass!"

Now that a Denver jury found little brother T.C. guilty of resisting arrest, this will undoubtedly be used as proof of persecution and the excuse for future run-ins with the law. The civil right$ lawsuit goes ahead.

Marxist rag Worker's Weekly World has seized on this story to push its leftist agenda and made some rather entertaining claims, none of which are sourced, needless to say. Among the highlights are that the Armstrong family are "under constant police surveillance," that Earl is followed "every time he leaves his home," was *gasp* "stopped and cited," and that T.C. had suffered "bite marks." Giggles galore: http://www.workers.org/2005/us/denver-1201/


Older brother Earl arrested for beating his ho:

Downtown Denver Does Not Have a Vagrant Problem... Really

As I had expected the moment the Democratic National Committee chose Denver for the '08 convention, the city is scrambling to get the unsightly homeless off the streets of downtown to give the Democratic lovers of the impoverished and downtrodden a happy experience in August. They're trying to bait them with big-screen TVs at homeless shelters and free passes to the zoo (where they can annoy the locals) to keep them off of downtown streets and away from the cash cow of wandering liberals. Fat chance. Undoubtedly, if all else fails, expect a repeat of former mayor Wellington Webb's old strong-arm tactic of simply harassing them, such as was done when a container town near the Platte River was torn down to make way for loft construction in Lower Downtown. Expect territorial clashes in Civic Center Park between drug dealers and winos and the Marxist ReCreate 68 interlopers who plan on building an illegal tent city there.

We still haven't heard how the city will handle unwitting visitors wandering into Ted Haggard's old stomping ground, East Colfax. Guard your wallets and guard your loins.



Source article

Denver City Park - Still Wholesome!

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.