Denver Post Continues to Peddle Pro-Illegal Alien Mythology

Speak of the devil, in today's Denver comPost we have the long-haired hippy and 1970s fossil Mike Littwin yet again peddling a utopian view of illegal aliens with the long debunked canard that illegal aliens don't contribute to crime. How does he do this? By disingenously pointing to the lowering crime rates in Arizona as evidence. This is easily enough debunked; what really amazes me is that people actually can get and keep jobs with newspapers writing this kind of mythological crap. Quite sneakily, and undoubtedly to avoid complaints of bias, he cites a CATO Institute commentator by the name of Daniel Griswold who made the claim that crime overall in the country is down, including in Arizona in a very short and rather flaccid piece. First of all, the CATO Instutiute is known for its promotion of amnesty (any search of their website will bear this out). Littwin probably thought it would add weight to his argument to cite a CATO study instead of a similar one by, say, La Raza. Secondly, the CATO Institute picked this piece up from Commentary Magazine, where it was originally published. Commentary has been criticized as being not much more than an ethnocentric think tank publication published by neoconservative Jews which promotes Jewish interests the way La Raza promotes Mexican interests. Not exactly a publication of mass-appeal and not exactly one that a person should rely on for accurate information, either.

In reailty, there are plenty of government studies which talk about the massive dark side to illegal aliens which CATO, Commentary and Littwin are ignoring. Go figure. Maybe its because they all have an agenda? We are supposed to believe that the illegal alien explosion has nothing to do with the chronologically coinciding explosion of Mexican gangs from California to Washington, D.C. and even to Ontario, Canada? Indeed, this little factoid and others are missing entirely from the pleadings of the CATO institute and its ideological allies. Unknown to many is United States Government Accountability Office studies showing that

In our population study of 55,322 illegal aliens, we found that they were arrested at least a total of 459,614 times, averaging about 8 arrests per illegal alien. Nearly all had more than 1 arrest. Thirty-eight percent (about 21,000) had between 2 and 5 arrests, 32 percent (about 18,000) had between 6 and 10 arrests, and 26 percent (about 15,000) had 11 or more arrests. Most of the arrests occurred after 1990. They were arrested for a total of about 700,000 criminal offenses, averaging about 13 offenses per illegal alien. One arrest incident may include multiple offenses, a fact that explains why there are nearly one and half times more offenses than arrests. Almost all of these illegal aliens were arrested for more than 1 offense. Slightly more than half of the 55,322 illegal aliens had between 2 and 10 offenses. About 45 percent of all offenses were drug or immigration offenses. About 15 percent were property-related offenses such as burglary, larceny-theft, motor vehicle theft, and property damage. About 12 percent were for violent offenses such as murder, robbery, assault, and sex-related crimes. The balance was for such other offenses as traffic violations, including driving under the influence; fraud--including forgery and counterfeiting; weapons violations; and obstruction of justice. Eighty percent of all arrests occurred in three states--California, Texas, and Arizona. Specifically, about 58 percent of all arrests occurred in California, 14 percent in Texas, and 8 percent in Arizona.

What does the epicenter of this argument - Arizona - have to say about this? The Maricopa County DA released some data of their own as well, which said in part,

County Attorney Andrew Thomas released today the results of research by his office showing the illegal immigrant crisis is having a profound impact on crime. An analysis of all defendants sentenced for felonies in 2007 in Maricopa County Superior Court shows 18.7% to be in the United States illegally. Factoring in a random sample of those whose immigration status was initially unknown and later determined to be illegal, the study finds that the number rises to 21.8%. By comparison, illegal immigrants constitute an estimated 9% of the total population.

The analysis found that in 2007, illegal immigrants accounted for:

- 16.5% of those sentenced for violent crimes
- 18.5 % of those sentenced for property crimes
- 33.5% of those sentenced for the manufacture, sale, or transport of drugs
- 50% of those sentenced for crimes related to "chop shops"
- 35.8% of those sentenced for kidnapping
- 20.3% of those sentenced for felony DUI.

Likewise, for crimes more generally associated with illegal immigration, illegal immigrants accounted for:

- 44% of those sentenced for forgery and fraud
- 85.3% of those convicted of criminal impersonation for false ID
- 96% of those convicted for human smuggling.

It is estimated that each violent crime costs citizens about $20,000, and each property crime costs citizens $4,363 per offense.

Crime may be down overall, but that is no reason to think that illegal aliens aren't causing a huge crime problem in this country. To argue this is a logical fallacy at best, and dishonest at worst.

In another one of Littwin's race card arguments (lifted from Griswold), he attacks detractors of amnesty such as Tom Tancredo and Lou Dobbs for warning about the threat of multiculturalism endangering American culture by cutely comparing it to Italian immigration in the late 20th century as if its remotely similar. Hint: Italians assimilated, came legally, and in much smaller numbers. Mexicans, many millions who have given the finger to American law (and Americans by extension) by coming here illegally, have no intention to assimilate, hence the birth of the term "multiculturalism." It's not a hard conclusion to come to: millions of unassimilable, indeed often outright hostile, Mexican flag waving Mexicans settle here and eventually gain the demographic majority. Who in their right mind would think these people would remotely care about the Founding Fathers and the intentions they had for this nation, let alone the European-originated culture it has always held since its inception? The majority of Mexican activists have done nothing but thumb their noses at this country. Mexico intelligently partly bases its immigration policy on not upsetting the demographic balance. Why don't we have the common sense to bring back our own version of this law?

Littwin's blindness must be voluntary; do liberals go through a process of poking their eyes out or something? His cutesy tie-in, upon closer analysis, falls flat. Welcome to Mejico Norte.
Please, Littwin, find better sources for your silly arguments.

It should be obvious to anyone with an IQ higher than 10 that people who give the finger to the rule of law upon entering the country have no interest in suddenly playing nice-nice once we give them what they want. Hello, McFly...

The amnesty of 1986 granted 3 million illegal aliens instantaneous legal status. As a result of that, illegal migration was encouraged and ballooned to where we are now burdened with 12 million illegal aliens, a four-fold increase in migration. It is then safe to estimate that any kind of amnesty or euphemistically titled legalization scheme will take the 12 million illegals here now and blow it up another four-fold in the coming years, leaving us with a rounded off total of FIFTY MILLION ILLEGAL ALIENS. This country will collapse under the weight, you can bet on it.

America's Immigration Problem Solved: Let's Copy Mexico's Immigration Law

Surely you've heard repeatedly on television, especially, how "racist" Americans are who want immigration law enforced are. We are told that we are not just "racist," but also, "xenophobes," "nativists," and generally "bigots." Mexican ethnic activist groups such as La Raza (literally translated "The Race" in Spanish, even though Mexicans are not a race and hypothetical discrimination against them would not be "racism") who have been allying with American (and I use the term loosely) organizations such as the ADL along with numerous Catholic organizations and other stateside ethnic interest and business lobbies to pry the American borders open like a hooker's legs have made the race card a favored weapon in their arsenal.

Never mind that the US already has grossly liberal immigration policy, they want it even more liberal; in fact, they basically don't want us to have a border at all. Mexicans, we are told, are "indigenous" to this area and that we "stole" their land from them. I for one, would like to know how the colonial land claims of a country established by white colonial rulers (and indeed still ruled by them 500 years down the road) have any more of a claim to land than another country established by white colonial rulers has? Every time I ask an amnesty proponent this question (as invariably the idiots throw out the "you stole it" canard), I never get a coherent answer. Indeed, I usually get the narrow batch of slurs as I've already mentioned above. Mexico was never any more accepting of or catering to the desires of the Indian groups occupying the American Southwest than the US Calvary was; in fact, Mexico made it a point of calling on the US government to send military forces to help them fend off Ute raids from their settlements in what is now Colorado's San Luis Valley, where Utes were known to kidnap and enslave Mexican children. So much for a "unida raza." Reconquista sentiment is built around a gamut of myths and historical distortions so numerous as to boggle the mind. In the end of course, its all just a ruse and a feel-good justification for millions of failed, impoverished poeople to leave their failed, impoverished country and venture to a better-run country for decent living conditions while saving face in the process.

The blatantly racist double standard to which pro-amnesty Mexicans and their backers are peddling in the US is especially stark when considering that Mexico's own immigration laws are extremely strict; so strict, in fact, that the US would do well for itself in adopting them. This would not only control our illegal alien problem but completely disarm race card playing Mexicans at the same time. To summarize Mexico's General Law on Population it ensures that

- immigration authorities have a record of each foreign visitor
- foreign visitors do not violate their visa status
- foreign visitors are banned from interfering in the country's internal politics
- foreign visitors who enter under false pretenses are imprisoned or deported
- foreign visitors violating the terms of their entry are imprisoned or deported
- those who aid in illegal immigration will be sent to prison

Foreigners are admitted into Mexico "according to their possibilities of contributing to national progress." (Article 32)

Immigration officials must "ensure" that "immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance" and for their dependents. (Article 34)

Foreigners may be barred from the country if their presence upsets "the equilibrium of the national demographics," when foreigners are deemed detrimental to "economic or national interests," when they do not behave like good citizens in their own country, when they have broken Mexican laws, and when "they are not found to be physically or mentally healthy." (Article 37)

The Secretary of Governance may "suspend or prohibit the admission of foreigners when he determines it to be in the national interest." (Article 38)

Local police departments must assist - not hinder like American ones selectively do - in the enforcement of these laws :

Federal, local and municipal police must cooperate with federal immigration authorities upon request, i.e., to assist in the arrests of illegal immigrants. (Article 73)

and, that

A National Population Registry keeps track of "every single individual who comprises the population of the country," and verifies each individual's identity. (Articles 85 and 86)

A national Catalog of Foreigners tracks foreign tourists and immigrants (Article 87), and assigns each individual with a unique tracking number (Article 91)

Foreigners with fake immigration papers may be fined or imprisoned. (Article 116)

Foreigners who sign government documents "with a signature that is false or different from that which he normally uses" are subject to fine and imprisonment. (Article 116)

Foreigners who fail to obey a deportation order are to be punished. (Article 117)

Foreigners who are deported from Mexico and attempt to re-enter the country without authorization can be imprisoned for up to 10 years. (Article 118)

Foreigners who violate the terms of their visa may be sentenced to up to six years in prison (Articles 119, 120 and 121). Foreigners who misrepresent the terms of their visa while in Mexico -- such as working with out a permit -- can also be imprisoned.

"A penalty of up to two years in prison and a fine of three hundred to five thousand pesos will be imposed on the foreigner who enters the country illegally." (Article 123)

Foreigners with legal immigration problems may be deported from Mexico instead of being imprisoned. (Article 125)

Foreigners who "attempt against national sovereignty or security" will be deported. (Article 126)

A Mexican who marries a foreigner with the sole objective of helping the foreigner live in the country is subject to up to five years in prison. (Article 127)

Shipping and airline companies that bring undocumented foreigners into Mexico will be fined. (Article 132)

DPS Administration Needs to Be Fired In Toto

Tom Boasberg, the new DPS superintendent, along with his fellow administrators, are pushing a political agenda with taxpayer dollars under the guise of protecting DPS workers from "racial profiling." Unless it's a habit of Denver Public Schools to send their people across state lines in a pickup truck with 30 DPS workers hanging out of the back of it or otherwise engage in suspicious behaviors, the claim that there is a risk of being "profiled" is completely in their heads, and hence DPS administration is taking it upon themselves to push a political agenda with city dollars.

Worse, Boasberg makes a fraudulent claim that "the community" has his back and is "deeply outraged." Oh? Who did he ask? Himself and his cronies? Channel 7 posted an article about this DPS boycott and included a reader poll asking if DPS was in the right or wrong, and it would seem that the community doesn't have Boasberg's back at all.


Boasberg and his liberal DPS allies are the same ones letting Mexican kids cut school to protest at immigration rallies. Specifically kids from predominantly Mexican West and North high schools keep showing up marching against every move legislators make to control the border. Wonder who is cheering them on and empowering them? Look no further than Boasberg.

If Boasberg & Co. were pushing an anti-amnesty agenda with city funds and trucking in bus loads of white kids out of white schools to protest amnesty sentiments, you can bet all hell would break loose.

Denver comPost's Rampant Bias Problem

If the comPost isn't hurling its biases around in articles by the likes of Mike Littwin (Obama zombie blame-whitey moonbat,) Tina Griego (sappy pro-illegal alien, race-baiting prose writing moonbat), and Susan Greene (neurotically liberal Jewish moonbat who can only find bias if it comes in a white, Christian package), its busy applying the same kind of biases on its forums against people who say things against the liberal party line that the comPost is dedicated to parroting. Today was the third time since January that I have been issued a "board warning" for posts which were then deleted, always because I said something to infuriate the liberal readership and moderators of the forum. I was told that "racist comments, veiled or otherwise, are a violation of forum rules." I actually expected this response and went ahead and posted anyway to make a point.

I drew an intentional comparison in media coverage between the pro-illegal alien rallies and the Tea Party rallies and struck a nerve. I applied the language of the media in their vitriolic descriptions of Tea Partiers to amnesty protesters, and came up with this:

Its funny when the media admit and refuse to condemn Latinos voting in racial blocs. Clearly the only time that racial-bloc voting is a no-no is with the fairer race. The MSM has been going viral lately at the hues of protesters at Tea Party rallies, frequently making stereotypical comments like, "All those white faces, whew, kind of looks like a Nazi rally, doesn't it?!" Yet, alas, when non-whites show up in numbers to pursue something obviously in their racial interests, we don't hear condemantions. Why is that? Where are the comments saying things like, "Wow, look at all those Mexicans. I haven't seen this many since I toured San Quentin," or, "Last time I saw this many dark faces was when I drove by the Five Points foodstamp office," or how about this dinger: "Now I undertstand what it must have been like at the Alamo!" How about at least something like, "Notice all those brown faces? That means that their cause is not widely accepted by a variety of Americans but rather pertains only to the narrow prejudices of their race."

What is with the anti-white double standard, Denver com-Post?

I got a nice six thumbs-up votes from readers before board admins issued a "board warning" for my "racism." I responded and thanked them for their cooperation in proving my point.

Just wait until they lock their jaws into Tim Tebow, he is the embodiment of everything they hate. Don't believe their "tolerance" rhetoric for a single minute; they only "tolerate" what they don't hate and if you don't hate what they don't hate you are intolerant and hateful.

Denver comPost forum member notanillegalalien nailed it with this:

La Raza = racists

LULAC = racists

MeCHA = racists

MALDEF = racists

The illegal alien immigration issue is based on racism - THEIRS.

Five Points Isn't Safe for Skateboarding?! No Way!

Techncially speaking, it didn't occur in Five Points, but its close enough: one block away from the official boundary of the neighborhood, which people living with their heads in the clouds think will be made all nice-nice if only some rich white people move in. You wish.

Ignoramous Suburbanitus is an epidemic disease. Unfortunately it's usually not discovered until the victim is hit on the head with reality after spending a childhood and early adulthood in a nice, quiet, demographically homogenous suburb. For such people, the city of Denver is a bag of surprises. This guy got his ass gang-attacked in front of his kids for opening his mouth in a ghetto dispute. That the race of the perpetrators wasn't published almost always means it was those of a swarthier persuasion. People such as that are media darlings and the media expend no small amount of energy covering their backs. Besides, its Five Points. HELLO.

Some guy from Arvada has been taking his kids to some skate park built recently during the era of ghetto gentrification. Sorry, dude, but locals know better. Crime-ridden, economically depressed areas are those that are targeted for gentrification. Gentrification means high crime inner city, which is why the areas are depressed to begin with. Crime and econmic destitution go hand in hand. It's a basic fact. Get used to it. In fact, people with half a brain should turn and run from gentrified places, unless they like paying top-notch prices for Crips, homeless people with lice, and heroin addicts shooting up in every other doorway.

More than enough has come out in the media (and this blog) about the crime problems these liberal do-gooders are encountering in the Five Points/Lower Downtown areas to give someone pause. If you don't know by now, you aren't paying attention.

(Source)

Things Go Better with Pot Heads - NOT!

I was actually banned from the city-data.com forums last year for having the audacity to assert that the Capitol Hill neighborhood of Denver is full of potheads.

I have a very difficult time believing that anyone who has lived in either Capitol Hill or it's neighboring areas of North Capitol Hill, City Park West, and Cheesman Park have a hard time believing that this area of town is full of pot heads. I can give a couple of perfect examples:

Very recently a man living near me had the police called on him because he was having some kind of bizarre fit, screaming incoherently and throwing things against the walls in his apartment. After upwards of an hour of this, police arrived and he was arrested for acting belligerently and resisting. He refused to open his door and give the police his name. That meant that when the door was finally opened, the police did an around-the-neck grip, dragged him out of his apartment by his neck and slammed him against the wall. The cops inspected the apartment exclaimed that he "broke everything" and even punched a couple holes in the walls. Why? His roommate would not buy him marijuana. This pothead has not been heard from since he was taken to jail and all of the broken things from the apartment were thrown outside upon eviction.

Another example circa 1988:

I had the fortune of having an eccentric man approximately 50 years old living across the hall from me. I think he was a Buddhist or something, I could sometimes hear bizarre religious-like chanting coming from his door. After some months of living by him I noticed a pattern in his behavior. Off and on he would have these odd fits, beating walls, breaking things, stomping and yelling. Shortly following that, the smell of some kind of marijuana would emanate from his apartment for several days nearly nonstop during which time he was placid and quiet. This repeated cyclically for months on end. In time, I noticed he would thrash around his apartment in rage for a time, then storm out of his apartment in utter anger, banging the door shut. He'd return about 15 minutes later holding a plain white package. Give him another five minutes and the smell of burning weed was strong, and his anger subsided, his rants ceased, his apartment quiet. I couldn't figure out where the soothing mystery packages were coming from until one day I was outside down the street and happened to see him emerge from the check cashing joint at East Colfax and Vine Streets, carrying a non-descript plain white box. There were rental mailboxes in that business. Someone was actually using the mail system to send this guy weed.

Ah, Denver.

Why is Northeast Park Hill Still a Dump?

Expending much energy citing "economic racism," it's common for leftist activists to cry about how businesses do not often establish themselves in the black community. Crying racism is the usual band-aid excuse to avoid a deeper look at the real reasons of what is going on. The nationwide pattern of crime-blighted black communities plays out in Denver, Colorado as well. Why? Because anywhere blacks settle in numbers, crime escalates and gangs are always present. Neither of these are conducive to business growth. Indeed, the only economic growth the Northeast Park Hill Area has seen in decades is the redevelopment of the land of the former Stapleton International Airport, and even this had to be done with a massive infusion of public dollars because the area is so gross that nobody wanted to touch it with a ten-foot pole. Results at Stapleton are mixed, and I have a sneaking suspicion that most of the whites who have moved in this area are relocated out-of-staters (much like you see around the former Rocky Flats nuclear weapons plant) because locals know better than to go anywhere near the place. More on Stapleton later, for now we'll focus on Northeast Park Hill.

The "jewel" of Northeast Park Hill was a strip-mall style shopping center which was once probably decades ago a thriving economic center with room for a full-sized grocery store as an anchor. By 1990, when I first began taking the bus through there on the way to work near the old airport, however, the shopping center, Holly Square, was already a decrepit dump with few tenants. The back wall of the Square always seemed to be coated in gang graffiti, Crips and Bloods taunting each other back and forth. In the late 1990s, the "anchor" of the mall, as it were, was the local Nation of Islam mosque #51 with it's adjoining NOI-owned seafood restaurant. Old gang graffiti would be painted over only to be sprayed on again within a short time. The eastern side of the Holly Square lot featured an electronic switch box of some kind adorned with Crip death threats toward neighborhood Blood gang members in prominent blue paint.

In spite of this, the city kept pushing to develop the Holly Square. Some time in the 2000s, how I do not know but probably with government funding of some sort, Holly Square was quite extensively remodeled and updated. Efforts were made to bring in a few small local businesses, and things seemed okay. One problem. Holly Square was a longtime Bloods gang hangout and when the founder of the Rollin 30s Crips was gunned down by the Bloods, it didn't take long for the Crips to decide that a good way of exacting revenge was to burn down the favored hangout of the Bloods.. So, early one morning...



The Crip arsonists, being the intelligent lot they are, not only sloppily torched Holly Square but did it so that a nearby security camera caught the whole thing. I'm sure the Denver Police enjoyed watching as "one of the Molotov cocktails rolled off the roof and hit the head of the person who threw it, causing his head to catch fire." Being even stupider, they drove a truck full of molotov cocktail-making materials with a broken tail light away from the scene and were shortly pulled over for a broken light violation and very quickly found themselves in jail and charged with arson. (Source)

In the end, another liberal lift-you-up scheme goes up in ashes.

UPDATE: Last 2 of the 10 Crip arsonists have been sentenced to prison. See their downtrodden mugshots here.

Rocky Flats: Propaganda vs Reality

Harmless?



Radioactive Snow



From the documentary Dark Circle

Why Did Mainstream Media Drop Downtown Denver Hate Crime Spree Into the Memory Hole?

21 more formally charged in downtown Denver attacks

Imagine the scene. A couple white gangs in Denver intiate new members by sending them to downtown Denver where they are told to selectively beat, attack, and rob people of black or hispanic origin who are known to have popular social spots in certain sections of the downtown Denver area. The Denver police, DA's office and even the FBI participate in creating a task force to stop these racial crimes. In the end, 35 arrest warrants are issued. The moment the police department holds its first press conference about having made 32 arrests the day before in this racist hate crime spree, media nationwide - no, worldwide - catch on and the story goes viral. All major US networks and nationally-read newspapers immediately catch the story and run with it much as they did with the Duke University gang-rape allegation. Civil and human rights leaders appear and gather before microphones hurling moralistic invective at racists everywhere. The name "Denver 35" is coined. Headlines are streaked with the shocking revelations about a white racist gang attacking people and the talking heads babble about the continued problem with racism and white supremacism in this country has and how can this still be going on, etc., etc., etc...

Everything in the above paragraph happened except the races of the attackers and victims were reversed the national media coverage never manifested. Why did this story which is obviously huge in scope - in fact the largest hate crime spree in Denver history - not get a single drop of national media coverage? Why, indeed? Why, worse, did many, including myself, predict this would happen? Because the victims of this racial crime spree were white and the perpetrators were black. Denver District Attorney Mitch Morrisey stated that young white males were specifically singled out. One white woman was sexually assaulted (while being told that white women want it) and injuries to some white male victims included a broken jaw, a broken eye socket, a skull fracture and coma as well as another man being thrown through a plate glass window.

The same national media who chose to pick up on the Duke University scam and run with it like a quarterback on steroids are the same people who to a man ignored this story. Isn't that something? I kept hoping for just a bit of coverage.. Something. Anything. I kept looking at CNN, MSNBC, and even FoxNews, the so-called white racist network. Not a peep. The day following the police press conference. Nothing.

If this does not illustrate the anti-white bias of the modern politically correct walk-on-eggshells climate in this country, what does? "Anti-racist" my ass.



Click here for mugshots of the perpetrators.

If You Didn't Think Denver Was Nuts Already...

Denver voters will be asked to create commission to probe UFOs

Jeff Peckman, a self-described entrepreneur who at the age of 55 still lives with mommy and who came up with a fake UFO video made with some kind of sock puppet that moves like a human arm in an obvious cheap media stunt to sell DVDs has collected enough signatures to get another one of his trash initiatives onto Denver ballots in the next election. He collected 10,000 signatures (only 4,211 of the names turned out to be acceptable) to place his kooky idea to force the city of Denver to create a UFO commission for the purpose of gathering evidence that space aliens have been visiting the earth.

Perhaps Richard Heene has been hanging out with this guy. Why are they attracted to Colorado?

Mayor Hickenloopy Wants to Feed Pigeons With Your Tax Dollars

Oh boy!

I can’t help but ask (if I haven’t already?) what the hell is wrong with liberals? This city has a mayor who since day one of his occupancy of the mayor’s office has made it his personal crusade to “end homelessness in Denver.” Unless you’re 5 years old or such a blinded Utopian, anyone with half a brain knows there is no such thing. You would assume, and usually correctly so, that such bubbly nonsense would just be some warm-fuzzy political slogan. But oh, no. This guy is serious, and he’s trying to do it largely with public tax dollars.

Does it matter that we’re in a recession, that nearly 200 Denver city employees have been laid off, others required furlough time, cutting pay raises for city hospital workers, postponing raises for cops and budget cuts that affect city libraries? Nope! Somehow, magically, this Utopian bobblehead has declared that the city can afford over two million samoleons to house derelicts who already flock to Denver in large numbers even from out of state because they heard on the grapevine about the services offered to the homeless in the downtown Denver area, hence the pigeon comment.

What happens when you try to take a small amount of food and feed a few pigeons?



You think its bad downtown now? Keep feeding these pigeons.

Source

This Explains Everything!

Now I realize what's wrong with Denver! 65,000 reptilians live here! Thank goodness this fine man stepped forward!